Thursday, February 2, 2012
Are we Martians?
Mars and the Earth have very similar rotation periods
and axial tilts. Since the notorius ‘discovery’ of canals,
Mars and its inhabitants have been a popular subject
in science fiction stories. Later observations revealed
a very thin atmosphere and low temperature, which
make Mars a rather hostile place. Finally, the Viking
landers showed a marred planet. Yet the possibility of
some simple life forms cannot be excluded.
In 1984 a meteorite was found in the Allan Hills
region in Antarctica and labelled as ALH 84001 (Fig.
20.4). The piece of rock was estimated to be 3.9 Ga old.
Chemistry of the meteorite shows that it had originated
on Mars; an impact had thrown it to an orbit that brought
it to the Earth.
In 1996 a group of NASA scientists announced that
the meteorite contained structures resembling fossilized
microbes and compounds that could be products of
living organisms, such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
(or PAH) and magnetite. However, they can be
produced by other processes, too. Not surprisingly, the
results and the implications of Martian life caused a lot
of skepticism. Only further Mars expeditions and possible
in situ experiments can decide whether there has
been life on Mars.
In case there has really been life on Mars, there are
several possibilities:
Life originated independently on the Earth and Mars.
Life originated only on the Earth and was then transported
to Mars.
Life originated only on Mars and was transported to the
Earth.
It seems that life on the Earth emerged almost as soon
as the conditions became favourable. It has been argued
that the life appeared even too quickly. This problem
would be solved if life originated on Mars. The surface
of the more distant and smaller Mars had cooled down
faster to become habitable before the Earth. Thus life
would have had more time to evolve on Mars, and was
transferred to the Earth when conditions here became
suitable. Thus our earliest ancestors could be Martian
bacteria. Presently such considerations are, however,
just speculations.
The idea of life spreading from one celestial body
to another is known as panspermia. The idea dates
back to the antiquity, but its first serious advocate was
the Swedish chemist Svante Arrhenius, who published
a book on the subject in 1908. Of the later proponents,
Sir Fred Hoyle was the most famous. Panspermia
fit well to his cosmology: the universe had no beginning,
neither did life, but had always existed. Thus
the tough problem of the origin of life was neatly
avoided.
Now panspermia, in a certain more limited sense,
begins to seem a little more possible theory. Primitive
life forms can survive inside meteorites in the coldness
and lethal radiation of the interplanetary space long
enought to travel from one planet to another. Interstellar
distances, though, are too long, and the probability of
a meteoroid from one planetary system hitting another
system is too low. It seems obvious that our life has
originated here in our own solar system.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment